Hi John, > whether we can force BIND to realize same Name Resolution ( A records) , > i search named.conf detail and *found the command ***rrset-order fixed ) > *will be suitable *, but fixed will be support by BIND 8 , > > and i use BIND 9 now , if possible , please give me some advisement
Checking section 6.2.16.14 of the BIND 9.10 Administrators Reference Manual (https://www.isc.org/downloads/bind/doc/): -=- In this release of BIND 9, the rrset-order statement does not support ”fixed” ordering by default. Fixed ordering can be enabled at compile time by specifying ”–enable-fixed-rrset” on the ”configure” command line. -=- However, my reading of fixed ordering ('the order they are defined in the zone file') implies it can only work on an authoritative server that has a full copy of the zone. A server that is iterating will receive records in the order that the authoritative sorts them, and I don't see how the iterating server can reorder them against the zone file. sortlist (section 6.2.16.13 of 9.10) might be more appropriate, but it's scaled more towards continent-sized address blocks rather than reordering all answers lexicographically. Graham _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users