In article <mailman.645.1461772844.73610.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, Sam Wilson <sam.wil...@ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> In article <mailman.633.1461768150.73610.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > "Baird, Josh" <jba...@follett.com> wrote: > > > Any thoughts on a service like Cloudfare's 'CNAME Flattening' [1]? > > > > [1] > > https://blog.cloudflare.com/introducing-cname-flattening-rfc-compliant-cname > > s-at-a-domains-root/ > > <delurk> > Does anyone else find themselves mentally yelling "apex!" whenever they > read the word "root" in that document? > </delurk> I've long since stopped getting bothered by sloppy language like this, ever since people started using "IP" as short for "IP address", or using "class A, B, C" to refer to /8, /6, and /24 prefixes, rather than the original address ranges. The context always makes it clear when root == apex. -- Barry Margolin Arlington, MA _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
