Hello Tom I only know of Knot having a feature available for this use case:
https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/2.x/html/configuration.html#synth-record-automatic-forward-reverse-records Daniel On 26.08.16 11:51, Tom wrote: > Many thanks for your quick feedback. > > This is the configuration-option, where I'm searching for. But probably > this will take some time, until it's accepted, tested, > implemented...etc. What do you propose in the meantime instead of using > wildcards or allow the clients to register themselves or making static > PTR-entries? How does other companies handle this issue? > > Kind regards, > > Tom > > > > On 08/26/2016 09:17 AM, Woodworth, John R wrote: >>> Hi list >>> >>> I'm searching a way to respond to IPv6-PTR-Queries like the "$GENERATE" >>> -mechanism for IPv4 has done it. >>> >>> I read about Delegation, self-registration with "tcp-self" or using >>> Wildcards with the disadvantage, that every query has the same response. >>> Is there a (planned) way, to generate reverse-responses "on-the-fly" >>> with bind? I'm using the latest bind (9.10.4-P2). >>> >> Tom, >> >> ** Full disclosure: I am directly involved in the Internet-Draft (I-D) >> referenced in the below response. >> >> Although this does not necessarily help you today, some colleagues and I >> are working on a new standard which addresses this problem in a more >> general way by introducing a new RR type. It provides several features >> beyond simply extending the $GENERATE directive to enormous proportions >> such as: allowing AXFR transfers of the "intent" of BULK record >> generation. If you are interested in learning more about this, please >> follow the link in my signature below. >> >> We appreciate any comments/ suggestions regarding this draft. >> >> >> Regards, >> John _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
