Am 08.10.2016 um 16:57 schrieb Pol Hallen:
192.168.1/24 is not a valid netmask
huh?
In linux and BSD I always use 192.168.1/24 (how shortcut of
192.168.1.0/24) and so on...
hint: using /24 everywhere is nonsense
why?
My goal is allow 192.168.1.0/24 (net) and deny 192.168.1.50 (host)
beause the netmask for a single address is /32 and not /24 - that
simple, if it would be right to always write /24 then the stuff would
not be needed at all :-)
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
