JCSL, Personally, my default choice for an OS is always FreeBSD first but let's be pragmatic. BSD 10.x changed drastically in many ways under the hood and control panel authors found the cost to benefit ratio too high to keep supporting FreeBSD. Assuming there is a really good reason why the choice for cPanel was made (support staff's knowledge/skill/ability of the software) is the choice of an OS that much of a project blocker?
When the hosting software breaks, is your team able to handle *anything* that come up? Especially if the software was hacked and slogged into place? The laws of unintended consequences have a very bad habit of asserting themselves at the least opportune time. Good project and change management considerations in the beginning will go a long ways in preventing pain and suffering should the worst happen. John -----Original Message----- From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Juan Carlos Sanchez-Leanos Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 7:03 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: BIND/Control Panel/FreeBSD Hello, We are planning to run BIND on a FreeBSD server. We planned to use CPANEL but is no longer available for FreeBSD. Do you have any other recommendation? Thanks in advance. JCSL -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
