In message <20161128195746.ga11...@weiser.dinsnail.net>, Michael Weiser writes: > Hi Kevin, > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:39:16PM +0000, Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote: > > > why > > specify "allow-update { none; };" when that's the default? > [...] > > If you're doing that only for documentation purposes, you could use a > > comment instead. > > Thanks Kevin! It never occured to me to just try commenting it out (and > researching the default) which indeed gets rid of the message. I'll > raise this with my Linux distribution (Gentoo).
Don't bother. 4507. [bug] Named could incorrectly log 'allows updates by IP address, which is insecure' [RT #43432] > -- > Thanks again, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users