Am 26.01.2017 um 16:30 schrieb Wolfgang Riedel:
I agree and also didn’t like it but I had been told that OpenSSL 1.1 is currently
not supported because they made backwards-incompatible API changes and this is the
default on Debian stretch. That’s the reason why I compiled from source to get to
1.0 < 1.1
but you should never use /usr for anything which don't end in a package
especially playing around with openssl will sooner ot later break your
whole system and then named is your smallest problem
additionall your major mistake here was that you *first* tried something
dangerous at your own while ask before would have leaded someone
pointing you to https://packages.debian.org/stretch/libssl1.0-dev
for Fedora 26 (Rawhide) a similar compat-package exists
On 26 Jan 2017, at 16:22PM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
Wolfgang Riedel <wrie...@me.com> wrote:
Just wonder if someone had success compiling bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0
(stretch)?
I haven't tried it myself.
1) OpenSSL dependency dance
I removed OpenSSL 1.1 and compiled OpenSSL 1.0.2e from source
You'll probably have better luck installing Debian's libssl1.0-dev and
related packages, rather than installing it yourself. Plain libssl-dev in
Stretch is OpenSSL 1.1.
If you install stuff yourself from source then it is particularly unwise
to put it in /usr where it'll collide with files managed by dpkg - put it
in /usr/local or /opt.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
