Why is preventing 127.0.0.1 being mapped to a AAAA not enough? Why do you want it mapped to ::1? Such a mapping is NOT part of DNS64.
> On 30 Nov 2017, at 3:04 pm, Sukmoon Lee <sm...@sk.com> wrote: > >> >> Why not just exclude 127.0.0.1 and not map to AAAA at all? > > > If it is answer 127.0.0.1 for test.com/IN/A in an IPv4, the client will not > attempt to connect to the network (only attempt to connect to loopback). > > However, if it is query test.com/IN/AAAA in an IPv6, DNS64 will answer > 64:ff9b::7f00:1 address. (dns64 prefix is 64:ff9b::/96). > > Then, the client will attempt to connect to 64:ff9b::7f00:1(NAT64). > > I want to prevent the client from attempting to network up to NAT64. > > So I want to reply 127.0.0.1 to ::1 in DNS64. > > And I was using to below option. But this is not what I want. > > dns64 64:ff9b::/96 { > ... > mapped { !127/8; any; }; > } > > Thanks. > > > > > >> >>> On 29 Nov 2017, at 7:32 pm, Sukmoon Lee <sm...@sk.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> I testing DNS64 using 64:ff9b::/96(prefix). >>> Some domain(IN/A) is responses to 127.0.0.1/IN/A. >>> Under DNS64, this domain(IN/AAAA) is working 64:ff9b::7f00:1. >>> >>> I want to response ::1 under DNS64. >>> Is there any way? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to >> unsubscribe from this list >>> >>> bind-users mailing list >>> bind-users@lists.isc.org >>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >> >> -- >> Mark Andrews, ISC >> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia >> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users