> that don't change the fact that from that moment on all protections for > *that* service are gone while with layered security and > systemd-hardening are still in place
Where is the layered security if you disable for e.g. systems-hardening for a service? I don't understand your argument. If you don't want to loose the security provided by the hardening, then you should not disable it but fix it. Daniel _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
