Ok got the issue and fixed it was long zone which was causing issue. On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Blason R <[email protected]> wrote:
> Whoo..what is this all about guys? Is there any limit for zones? > > Active: active (running) since Wed 2018-04-25 10:25:27 IST; 2s ago > Docs: man:named(8) > Process: 4085 ExecStop=/usr/sbin/rndc stop (code=exited, > status=0/SUCCESS) > Main PID: 4091 (named) > Tasks: 7 > Memory: 146.1M > CPU: 1.527s > CGroup: /system.slice/bind9.service > └─4091 /usr/sbin/named -f -u bind > > Apr 25 10:25:27 dnsfw named[4091]: managed-keys-zone: loaded serial 13 > Apr 25 10:25:27 dnsfw named[4091]: zone 0.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial 1 > Apr 25 10:25:27 dnsfw named[4091]: zone localhost/IN: loaded serial 2 > Apr 25 10:25:27 dnsfw named[4091]: zone 255.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial > 1 > Apr 25 10:25:27 dnsfw named[4091]: zone 127.in-addr.arpa/IN: loaded serial > 1 > *Apr 25 10:25:28 dnsfw named[4091]: dns_master_load: > /etc/bind/isnlab.in.db:345703: ran out of space* > *Apr 25 10:25:28 dnsfw named[4091]: zone isnlab.in/IN > <http://isnlab.in/IN>: loading from master file /etc/bind/isnlab.in.db > failed: ran out of space* > *Apr 25 10:25:28 dnsfw named[4091]: zone isnlab.in/IN > <http://isnlab.in/IN>: not loaded due to errors.* > > *I have around 300+ zones* > > *root@dnsfw:/etc/bind# named -v* > *BIND 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <id:ebd72b3>* > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Blason R <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Unfortunately neither RHEL nor CentOS gives RPM for 9.10+ and really >> compiling and building is really pain and time consuming. >> Hence I decided to give a try with Ubuntu 16.04 and any ways within few >> days 18.04 is coming out with 9.11. >> >> BTW is 9.11 branch stable? >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Mukund Sivaraman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:25:45PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote: >>> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:21:34PM -0700, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: >>> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:03:43PM +0530, Blason R wrote: >>> > > > I am building DNS RPZ on named BIND 9.9.4-RedHat-9.9.4-51.el7_4.2 >>> > > > (Extended Support Version). >>> > > >>> > > RPZ in BIND 9.9 is experimental and unsupported (except for the >>> > > subscription branch). Please use at least BIND 9.10 for RPZ. >>> > > >>> > >>> > We've been using RPZ in RHEL6-provided BIND (based on BIND 9.8.2) >>> > (based on BIND 9.8.2). >>> > >>> > No issues. Unsure if Red Hat backports the "more stable" code? >>> >>> I doubt it. But speaking for ISC BIND, 9.10+ is the only RPZ code we >>> bugfix and there have been a lot of bugs fixed. >>> >>> Mukund >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
