Am 25.06.2018 um 05:39 schrieb Paul Kosinski:
> Is it possible to get BIND not to respond at all, thereby causing
> a timeout on the query? That would perhaps reduce load more than
> NXDOMAIN or deleting the sone(s) would.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:32:44 +0200
Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
timeouts are expensive for both sides by definition
On 25.06.18 11:04, Paul Kosinski wrote:
How does *not* responding to a UDP query take longer for the *server*
than responding to UDP a query? Both responding and (deliberately) not
responding require identifying the query, but not responding bypasses
the time the server would need to construct the response, plus time
spent in the network stack. (I'm assuming we don't care about client
side "expense".)
not responding server will usually receive more queries.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
- Holmes, what kind of school did you study to be a detective?
- Elementary, Watson. -- Daffy Duck & Porky Pig
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
