> > Is that truly a requirement? > Is this not the same with Samba? Is there something specific about > Samba that does require it to be authoritative for the zone?
yes. :) https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Naming_FAQ#Why_This_Matters But I know that Windows servers just > need the ability to update DNS. They do not need to be authoritative > for it. How would this work in the scenario I described above? On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:37 PM Grant Taylor via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > On 06/26/2018 05:20 PM, Elias Pereira wrote: > > since the samba needs to be authoritative on its own dns. > > Is that truly a requirement? > > I've not messed with AD on Samba. But I know that Windows servers just > need the ability to update DNS. They do not need to be authoritative > for it. > > Is this not the same with Samba? Is there something specific about > Samba that does require it to be authoritative for the zone? > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to > unsubscribe from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > -- Elias Pereira
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users