> On 1 Feb 2019, at 7:34 am, Alan Clegg <a...@clegg.com> wrote: > > On 1/31/19 2:16 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: > >> Ok, fair point. I'll bring it up with the BIND team. >> >> If I don't return in 2 weeks, send in a search party. > > After a bit of discussion: > > https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/issues/852 > > has been re-opened. I still think it's a junk fingerprint, but it does > appear to me to be legal per-RFC.
Given type 1 is a SHA-1 fingerprint it isn’t legal. Named just hasn’t added type to length to the parsing code. No real SSHFP will be 1 octet long. > AlanC > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
