On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
> I need the help in figuring out whether BIND supports ANAME ? If yes,
> then from which version on wards ?
No, it doesn't. The effort to standardize ANAME stalled, and I doubt
it'll be coming back.
The new HTTPS and SVCB records look like a better approach anyway.
BIND will have support for those pretty soon.
On 09.08.21 13:55, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote:
But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years
until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be
implemented in the authoritative name server
recursive - authoritative server is not there to resolve remote hostnames, if
it doesn't provide recursion.
(well, it COULD try to resolve just as it resolves NS IPS for sending
notifies, but that's different).
resolving on authoritative server could in fact help, and wouldn't need protocol
change at all, but the problem above is crucial (what would you do in case
of failure? refuse whole zone?)
and hence would work for
every client/resolver as client/resolver never sees the ANAME but only the
A/AAAA record.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
