Hello Crist,

I have implemented the recommended changes. It works forward and reverse for the test record, from out domain or others, or for almost all of the test records.

There are still some spurious failures, such as this one:

200     IN      CNAME   200.186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr.
201     IN      CNAME   201.186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr.

nslookup 193.198.186.200 works and .201 doesn't, despite the symmetric definition:

root@domac:/etc/bind/zones# nslookup 193.198.186.200
200.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa    canonical name = 200.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa. 200.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa     canonical name = 200.186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr.
200.186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr       name = test-record1.slava.alu.hr.

Authoritative answers can be found from:
186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr   nameserver = domac.alu.hr.
domac.alu.hr    internet address = 161.53.235.3

root@domac:/etc/bind/zones# nslookup 193.198.186.201
** server can't find 201.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN

root@domac:/etc/bind/zones#

I can't get to the bottom of this, I don't know enough BIND9 internals.

It will take real-life production load tomorrow to see how this will behave with DHCP DDNS updates. :-)

You said ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY but I am an open source fan and I can live with that ;-)

Until tomorrow, then ...

Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac

On 12/12/2021 10:33 AM, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:

Hi Crist,

Now the resolution from the problematic record started working again without any change in zones or BIND9 options, also without the server process restart ... :-/

root@domac:~# nslookup -query=any 195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.
Server:         161.53.235.3
Address:        161.53.235.3#53

195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa     name = test-record.slava.alu.hr.

root@domac:~# nslookup -query=ptr 193.198.186.195
Server:         161.53.235.3
Address:        161.53.235.3#53

Non-authoritative answer:
195.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa    canonical name = 195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.
195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa     name = test-record.slava.alu.hr.

Authoritative answers can be found from:
192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa nameserver = domac.alu.hr.
domac.alu.hr    internet address = 161.53.235.3

root@domac:~#

I guess this was something with timeouts. Suppose this will work satisfactory on desktops that usually keep the same IP address assigned by DHCP across the lease renewals, but not for laptops, Android and iPhone devices that connect and disconnect, and change network ...

Why I want smartphones to have reverse PTRs is to see in logs if something becomes virus infected or even spambot, and not have to browse DHCP leases in forensic analysis, which my fellow administrator probably would not know how to do ...

Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac

On 12/12/2021 10:19 AM, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:

Hi Crist,

Thank you for your explanation. It was much appreciated.
However, as I previously asserted, it is impossible to know how the system will behave without testing it with real life production load on Monday :-)

On 12/11/2021 11:18 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
Looks like you're trying to use the setup in that serverfault link. That example only works on an internal network.
I thought the 186.198.193. part was enough to make the zone unique. But your assertion is correct: I would collide if any other administrators on other subnets in range 193.198.186.0/24 decide to make reverse DHCP DDNS update in the future. Thanks for the thought!
The point of the example I gave is that you are going to build your own reverse zone inside of a zone you control on the Internet. Now that you've given some examples, I can perhaps make it more obvious what I'm suggesting. Your DNS zone would look something like,

$ORIGIN 192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.

@       IN      NS domac.alu.hr <http://domac.alu.hr/>.
@       IN      NS bjesomar.srce.hr <http://bjesomar.srce.hr/>.

195     IN      PTR test-record.dhcp.slava.alu.hr <http://test-record.slava.alu.hr/>.

$GENERATE 200-222 $ CNAME $.186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr <http://186.198.193.dhcp.slava.alu.hr>.


And your DHCP configuration,

  ddns-domainname "slava.alu.hr <http://slava.alu.hr/>";
  ddns-rev-domainname "dhcp.slaval.alu.hr <http://dhcp.slaval.alu.hr>";
  zone slava.alu.hr <http://slava.alu.hr/>. {
   primary 127.0.0.1;
   key DDNS_UPDATE;
  }

NOT TESTED. NO GUARANTEES. NOT SUITABLE FOR ANY GIVEN PURPOSE. YOUR MILEAGE MAY VARY. PLEASE CONSULT YOUR PERSONAL PHYSICIAN BEFORE STARTING ISC PRODUCTS.
Noted. :-) I am not afraid of experimenting. But failures of the experimental setup are perceived as my incompetence, and success taken for granted the very next day ;-)
One other odd thing, sometimes you refer to a "192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa" zone and sometimes "192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa." Those are different names and are not interchangeable. Both are totally fine for use in DNS, but a lot of administrators don't like the '/' in zone names since they often use the zone name in file names. Slashes present a problem in file names on *nix flavored OSes. I used the dash, '-', version in my example.

This setup is mandated from the upper level sysadmins and I cannot control it, I can only beg them to use a hyphen as in RFC 2317 chapter 4 last paragraph, but I cannot guarantee that they will change it. It is their arbitrary decision. :-/

Frankly, /27 is more readable, but if it creates havoc in Linux resolver, then what the heck ...

Thank you very much again for your advice. I will post back here on the results with your recommended zone setup.

Kind regards,
Mirsad Todorovac

    Hi again,

    I had some luck in making this setup work. So far, so good ...
    However, there's no telling how the DHCP DDNS will function with
    the new 186.198.193.dhcp. zone before Monday morning when the
    subsidiary computers power up.

    However, I have an odd behavior which I cannot explain: without
    any change to zone a reverse resolution stopped working. The
    setup just doesn't seem stable enough to work with DHCP-updated
    dynamic DNS in our organization, with a lot of smartphones and
    wireless devices frequently signing on and off.

    The zone is:

    $ORIGIN 192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.

    @       IN      NS domac.alu.hr <http://domac.alu.hr>.
    ;@      IN      NS bjesomar.srce.hr <http://bjesomar.srce.hr>.

    195     IN      PTR test-record.slava.alu.hr
    <http://test-record.slava.alu.hr>.

    200     IN      CNAME   200.186.198.193.dhcp.
    201     IN      CNAME   201.186.198.193.dhcp.

    ; MT 20211211:
    ; Here's the magic:

    $GENERATE 202-222 $ CNAME $.186.198.193.dhcp.

    The command output shows that resolution succeeds, but nslookup
    can't finish it for some unknown spurious reason.

    root@domac:~# nslookup -query=any
    195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.
    Server:         161.53.235.3
    Address:        161.53.235.3#53

    195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa     name =
    test-record.slava.alu.hr <http://test-record.slava.alu.hr>.

    root@domac:~# nslookup -query=ptr 193.198.186.195
    Server:         161.53.235.3
    Address:        161.53.235.3#53

    ** server can't find 195.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa: NXDOMAIN

    root@domac:~#

    This kind of setup that sometimes works and sometimes doesn't
    will make me look incompetent.
    I know that BIND 9 is great open source server with lots of
    bells and whistles. But right now I can't study all those and I
    just want to survive, providing a solution fast enough for our
    uplevel sysadmins.

    The /etc/bind/named.conf.local part looks like:

    zone "192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa" in {
            type master;
            file "/etc/bind/zones/192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.db";
    };

    zone "186.198.193.dhcp" in {
            type master;
            file "/var/cache/bind/186.198.193.dhcp.db";
            allow-update { key DDNS_UPDATE; };
    };

    What possibly could be killing the name resolution between
    resolving 195.192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa to
    test-record.slava.alu.hr <http://test-record.slava.alu.hr>. and
    resolving 193.198.186.195 that apparently fails?

    Is there a way to see more interim debugging output?

    Thank you very much.

    Kind regards,
    Mirsad Todorovac



    On 12/11/2021 10:25 AM, Mirsad Goran Todorovac wrote:

    Hi Crist,

    Thank you for your reply and the information provided.

    I have roughly implemented this workaround. I was hoping there
    was a way to instruct BIND to masquerade a delegated domain
    with data from another (dynamically updated from ISC DHCP) zone.

    More accurately, my (from upper level) mandated delegation is
    the literal 192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa, using
    192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa says "ignoring records outside
    of the origin" or something like that.

    I have used the following records in the zone:

    $ORIGIN 192/27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.

    @       IN      NS domac.alu.hr <http://domac.alu.hr>.
    @       IN      NS bjesomar.srce.hr <http://bjesomar.srce.hr>.

    195     IN      PTR test-record.slava.alu.hr
    <http://test-record.slava.alu.hr>.

    $GENERATE 200-222 $ CNAME $.186.198.193.dhcp.

    /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf has this:

      ddns-domainname "slava.alu.hr <http://slava.alu.hr>";
      ddns-rev-domainname "dhcp";
      zone slava.alu.hr <http://slava.alu.hr>. {
       primary 127.0.0.1;
       key DDNS_UPDATE;
      }
      zone 186.198.193.dhcp. {
       primary 127.0.0.1;
       key DDNS_UPDATE;
      }

    However, don't I have to convince people managing
    bjesomar.srce.hr <http://bjesomar.srce.hr> to be a slave server
    for the "186.198.193.dhcp" zone? Or the dynamically updated
    reverse PTR record will have effect only in my local domain
    (which I had even before the entire setup), won't it?

    Also, I get spurious REFUSED or NXDOMAIN errors, some pass with
    time, so there must be some TTL or timeout.

    Kind regards,

    Mirsad

    On 12/11/2021 6:04 AM, Crist Clark wrote:
    No idea if this is the best way. It is a way.

    Do you control any other zone? Let’s say you own
    “example.com.” You can tell ISC DHCP to build the reverse zone
    at an arbitrary base name instead of in-addr.arpa.

    Configure DHCP to put the reverse records at say,
    “rev.example.com.” So you’ll get records at,

    193.186.198.193.rev.example.com
    <http://193.186.198.193.rev.example.com>
    194.186.198.193.rev.example.com
    <http://194.186.198.193.rev.example.com>
    …

    And in your RFC 2317-style delegation, you then enumerate
    another CNAME layer,

    $ORIGIN 192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.
    193  IN CNAME 193.186.198.193.rev.example.com
    <http://193.186.198.193.rev.example.com>.
    194  IN CNAME 194.186.198.193.rev.example.com
    <http://194.186.198.193.rev.example.com>.
    …

    On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:51 PM Mirsad Goran Todorovac
    <mirsad.todoro...@alu.unizg.hr> wrote:

        Hello,

        I have a problem with DHCP DDNS update to BIND 9 reverse
        PTR zone subnet that is owned by several organizations, so
        I can't get a direct DHCP DDNS update access with a key or
        with hostname.

        I have been delegated domain name
        |192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa from the upper level
        admins, and that appears to be immutable.|

        |However, my subnet is 193.198.186.192/27
        <http://193.198.186.192/27>, and DHCP only knows how to
        perform DDNS update to 186.198.193.in-addr.arpa. (See
        here:
        
https://serverfault.com/questions/806875/how-to-tell-isc-dhcp-correct-zone-for-reverse-zone-ddns-update
        and here:
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/htdig/dhcp-users/2006-August/001422.html
        ).
        |

        |(This setup is because we have DHCP addresses that are
        not over NAT, but /24 subnet is shared with other
        organizations, even under another Minstry.)|

        |I want to have the effect of delegating the same database
        to upper level under their zone name, while updating the
        same database under my DHCP-understood zone name.|

        |I tried this /etc/bind/named.conf.local:|

        |zone "192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa" in { type master;
        file "/var/cache/bind/192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.db";
        }; zone "186.198.193.in-addr.arpa" in { type master; file
        "/var/cache/bind/192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.db";
        allow-update { key DDNS_UPDATE; }; }; |

        (Two zones with the same file.)

        What I got was:

        |root@domac:/etc/bind# named-checkconf
        /etc/bind/named.conf.local:49: writeable file
        '/var/cache/bind/192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa.db':
        already in use: /etc/bind/named.conf.local:44
        root@domac:/etc/bind# Can you please tell me is there a
        way to achieve the effect of the above (illegal) setup? I
        can't change DHCP nor I know an option to tell it to
        accept update to |||192-27.186.198.193.in-addr.arpa| (it is a syntax 
error).
        The DHCP dhcpd.conf subnet configuration is: |||subnet 193.198.186.192 
netmask 255.255.255.224 { range
        193.198.186.200 193.198.186.222; # MT 20211210 option
        subnet-mask 255.255.255.224; option domain-name-servers
        161.53.235.3, 161.53.2.70; option domain-name
        "slava.alu.hr <http://slava.alu.hr>"; ddns-domainname
        "slava.alu.hr <http://slava.alu.hr>"; zone slava.alu.hr
        <http://slava.alu.hr>. { primary 127.0.0.1; key
        DDNS_UPDATE; } zone 186.198.193.in-addr.arpa. { primary
        127.0.0.1; key DDNS_UPDATE; } option broadcast-address
        193.198.186.223; option routers 193.198.186.193;
        default-lease-time 43200; max-lease-time 86400; } | Thank
        you very much for your time reading this mail and help.
        Kind regards, -- Mirsad Goran Todorovac Academy of Fine
        Arts | Faculty of Graphic Arts University of Zagreb |

        _______________________________________________
        Please visit
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
        unsubscribe from this list

        ISC funds the development of this software with paid
        support subscriptions. Contact us at
        https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


        bind-users mailing list
        bind-users@lists.isc.org
        https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


    _______________________________________________
    Please visithttps://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users  to 
unsubscribe from this list

    ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us athttps://www.isc.org/contact/  for more information.


    bind-users mailing list
    bind-users@lists.isc.org
    https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
    _______________________________________________
    Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
    to unsubscribe from this list

    ISC funds the development of this software with paid support
    subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for
    more information.


    bind-users mailing list
    bind-users@lists.isc.org
    https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


_______________________________________________
Please visithttps://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users  to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us athttps://www.isc.org/contact/  for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to