On 12-Apr-22 14:15, Philip Prindeville wrote:
In my case, I do split-horizon for my domain in-house and use RFC-1918 
addresses, so leaking them with the internet would be pointless anyway.

I have separate LOC records for in-house and external views.  The in-house version is high precision.  The external version is fuzzed.

I use LOC records on domains; the comparison with IP geolocation is because the usual alternative to LOC is to translate the domain name to an IP address; then geolocate that using one of the commercial databases.

Of course, that gets tricky when a hostname has multiple IP addresses or is served by anycast (such as a CDN).  In that case, the semantics aren't obvious - should the location be that of the CDN server (and which one)? The origin server?  And with 1918/NAT, the origin server may be in different locations depending on the protocol used.  (E.g. one public IP address, with an SMTP server in one building and a WWW server in another)

With WPs, you're not trying to locate a host at all; you're trying to infer (or calculate) the mobile device client's location.  Or assist the mobile device to calculate its location.

It's not clear to me that it's less work to prepopulate LOC records than to put a cellphone on top of the WAP before turning it on, getting the GPS coordinates (e.g. see the 'gpstest' app), and pasting them into the WAP's configuration.

If you really want cm scale accuracy, you need some kind of surveying instrument - whose data has to go someplace - be it LOC or the WAP configuration.  Or the new AP figures out its location based on triangulating from existing APs that somehow are deemed trustworthy.  THEY might have LOC records to help, but that's not pre-provisioning.  Maybe the new AP could then publish a LOC record with its location to help clients.  But I don't see how pre-provisioning helps setting up a new AP in this case; you might do the survey before the WAP arrives, but once the survey instrument reports a position, you either have prepared a configuration file for it (usual case), or you have to find it & configure it at that point.  Either way, setting the location is the smallest part of setting up a configuration - VLANs, SSIDs, access control/portals take much more work.

Anyhow, it's not clear exactly what problem you're asking LOC (or anything) to solve.

BTW, RFC1876 is worth reading for the suggested search algorithms.  I don't think it ever moved from "experimental", which may be part of why uptake hasn't been great.

Timothe Litt
ACM Distinguished Engineer
--------------------------
This communication may not represent the ACM or my employer's views,
if any, on the matters discussed.


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to