Wireshark works just fine on a Mac (I am using it right now) and yes, it is a great tool. You also have the choice of using tcpdump in a terminal window, if that's your preference. Personally I usually capture using tcpdump and view later in Wireshark.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 12:01, Petr Menšík <pemen...@redhat.com> wrote: > Wireshark is a great tool with a nice GUI, which can record you traffic > on selected ports. Just use capture filter port 5353. But I am not > certain it works on Mac just as it does not Linux. > > On 6/27/22 15:10, Larry Stone wrote: > > Petr, you are going to have to tell me how to create an appropriate PCAP > file. As most of this stuff works so well these days, it’s been years since > I had to do any sort of packet level analysis (moved on to other things > professionally) and what I knew of how to do that has long since been lost. > My issue is on a small home network so very little goes wrong. The > appropriate tcpdump command to get what is needed should be all I need. > > > > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support > subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more > information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users >
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
