> TLD Signed? Comments > -------------- ------- -------- > google.com no > gmail.com no > youtube.com no > apple.com no > microsoft.com no > amazon.com no > walmart.com no > outlook.com no > 1e100.net no > facebook.com no > twitter.com no > instagram.com no > ibm.com no > mozilla.org no > wikipedia.org no > redhat.com no > w3c.org no > bankofamerica.com no > > Does anybody have an explanation for why such big domains don't bother > using DNSSEC?
my guess is that they see dnssec as fragile, have not seen _costly_ dns subversion, and measure a dns outages in thousands of dollars a minute. randy --- ra...@psg.com `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd ra...@psg.com` signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
