> On 21 Oct 2022, at 03:51, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> Of course I would prefer to upgrade back to 9.18.X, but I guess I won't be 
>>>> able to find all EDNS0 incompatible servers and loosing customers to 
>>>> 8.8.8.8 - which is able to resolve these names..
>>> This is kind of moot argument - the DNS needs to evolve, and it can't 
>>> evolve if we keep supporting broken stuff. This needs to be fixed on the 
>>> authoritative operator side, not in BIND 9.
>> 
>> You're absolutely right. I guess I've just kind of given up on convincing 
>> other people the fix their stuff (dayjob trauma). Sorry about that.
> 
> It’s also a very small percentage of servers that are broken.  If you look at 
> the time series
> on https://ednscomp.isc.org/ you can drill done and see the values.  For 
> example there are a
> little over 10 servers for all zones in .GOV that exhibit this broken 
> behaviour.  It’s gone
> from ~11% in 2014 to 0.26% currently.  We are at the mop up stage.  For some 
> other populations
> we are at 0%.
> 
> The EDNS specification was updated in April 2013 to specify some unspecified 
> behaviour.  In
> particular this was added.

While I hearfully agree with the need to polish the network, some measures can 
be a problem unless there is a really big
commitment from the Big Guns.

In my case I had to abort an upgrade to 9.18 on our recursive servers because, 
well, “Google DNS worked better than ours”
going back to 9.16.

I know it´s the same situation that happened when Internet Explorer 
“successfully” rendered all kinds of abominations while proper web
clients barfed (with good reason!) and I also know that lousy formats and lack 
of respect for standars are the breeding
ground of serious security incidents.

End of rant: A wider consensus is needed.





Borja.


-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to