On 11/7/22 9:08 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I'm afraid that this problem can become really huge when someone creates huge amount of generated records, e.g. using proposed module.
Even if BIND's cache is simply FIFO -- which I'm fairly certain that it's smarter than that -- and flushes a less garbage record in favor of a more garbage record, then BIND will do what it's designed to do the next time someone queries for the less garbage record, namely it will go fetch it and cache it.
It will effectively be the same as if it never had the less garbage record in cache like if it is from a cold start.
It will be a small delay. But it won't negatively impact the stability or operation of BIND.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
