> On Jan 6, 2026, at 11:25 PM, Marco Moock <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 06.01.2026 15:25 Philip Prindeville via bind-users wrote:
> 
>> And if I modify isc-dhcp to hand out 1.1.1.1 and 1.0.0.1 as name
>> servers instead, things don’t work any better, so yeah… looks like a
>> packet loss issue.
>> 
>> Which is weird, because when speediest does manage to run, I
>> sometimes see 630/95mbs … other times… 45/19mbs.
> 
> Maybe your ISP handles that differently. Try mtr to the speedtest
> server and also try UDP speedtests.
> 
> Also run speedtests using iperf.
> 
> PS: Such a packet loss breaks most communication protocols, so it is
> definitely not a BIND issue.
> 
> Feel free to try to ping tr.dorfdsl.de, it will reply to ICMP echo
> request and ICMP is not blocked.




root@OpenWrt2:~# ping -c 100 82.139.252.18
PING 82.139.252.18 (82.139.252.18): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=15 ttl=44 time=181.893 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=16 ttl=44 time=198.328 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=17 ttl=44 time=196.629 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=18 ttl=44 time=189.267 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=19 ttl=44 time=190.943 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=20 ttl=44 time=186.505 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=21 ttl=44 time=187.158 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=22 ttl=44 time=305.577 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=46 ttl=44 time=707.312 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=47 ttl=44 time=193.969 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=48 ttl=44 time=183.566 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=49 ttl=44 time=193.445 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=50 ttl=44 time=193.228 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=51 ttl=44 time=250.036 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=52 ttl=44 time=192.115 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=53 ttl=44 time=330.809 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=54 ttl=44 time=290.306 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=77 ttl=44 time=1948.685 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=78 ttl=44 time=948.593 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=79 ttl=44 time=187.235 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=80 ttl=44 time=197.799 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=81 ttl=44 time=187.064 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=82 ttl=44 time=196.853 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=83 ttl=44 time=195.302 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=84 ttl=44 time=195.025 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=85 ttl=44 time=191.321 ms
64 bytes from 82.139.252.18: seq=86 ttl=44 time=205.361 ms

--- 82.139.252.18 ping statistics ---
100 packets transmitted, 27 packets received, 73% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 181.893/319.419/1948.685 ms
root@OpenWrt2:~# 



Are there any open iperf servers?

-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list.

Reply via email to