That is pretty weird. Since this is a segmentation fault in Bowtie, perhaps there are resource demands which are only satisfied on perceval (tmp space, #cores).
Presumably this worked when Bioc was released, so what have you changed in between? Best, Kasper On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Michael Stadler <michael.stad...@fmi.ch> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > I'm cc'ing the list; maybe somebody else has experienced differences > between petty and perceval. > > Rbowtie release (1.4.5) is not building under OS X 10.6.8 (petty). > > Rbowtie release (1.4.5) and development (1.5.5) are virtually identical > (only DESCRIPTION and NEWS differ). > > The development version builds without problems on perceval, but the > release version fails on petty: > > http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/Rbowtie/perceval-buildsrc.html > > http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/release/bioc-LATEST/Rbowtie/petty-buildsrc.html > > The only difference I can make out from the node info pages is that > perceval has an additional section on "C++11 compiler" that is lacking > from petty's NodeInfo page. > > Unfortunately, I cannot reproduce the issue, both Rbowtie 1.4.5 and > 1.5.5 build successfully under OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.5 using llvm-gcc-4.2. > > Do you have any idea what else could be different between petty and > perceval? > > Thank you, > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
