On 30 October 2014 17:43, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Laurent Gatto <lg...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I was under the (wrong) impression that experiment data packages would >> be following the same versioning convention as software with even/odd >> for release/devel branches. >> >> Would this be something that others would find useful? > > Bumping versions of data packages would results in very large amounts > of download at every Bioc release, even if there's no actual update to > the data packages. I'd vote "not a good idea" on this one.
Good point. But versions are bumped (I think) - two non-random examples: Bioc3.0/AffymetrixDataTestFiles has version 0.3.1 Bioc3.1/AffymetrixDataTestFiles has version 0.4.0 Bioc3.0/pRolocdata has version 1.3.5 Bioc3.1/pRolocdata has version 1.3.6 Laurent > /Henrik > >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Laurent >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel -- Laurent Gatto http://cpu.sysbiol.cam.ac.uk/ _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel