Dumb question (?) follows in line: > That is the plan. Note that we already have elementLengths() that serves the > same purpose. It was the direct inspiration for lengths().
Why have both? > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Peter Hickey <peter.hic...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The lengths() function was added in R 3.2 to "get the length of each > > element of a list or atomic vector (is.atomic) as an integer or > > numeric vector." It seems useful to me to have also a similar method > > defined for the S4Vectors::List class (and subclasses). What do others > > think? _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel