On 16 March 2016 02:21, Obenchain, Valerie wrote: > On 03/15/2016 04:05 PM, Laurent Gatto wrote: >> On 15 March 2016 21:45, Obenchain, Valerie wrote: >> >>> Hi Laurent, >>> >>> ExperimentHub won't be in the next release but will be active in the >>> next devel (Bioconductor 3.5). If you want to move your data from >>> AnnotationHub to ExperimentHub I can help with that but not until after >>> the release. We don't have a formal policy but it seems reasonable for >>> the 'more curated' datasets to be moved to ExperimentHub. >> The reason I bring this up is that I am slowly disseminating >> AnnotationHub as a way to obtain proteomics data (and plan to add more >> data soon). For example, I am supposed to finalise a book chapter by the >> end of the month where I have a section on obtaining MS/proteomics data >> that mentions AnnotationHub. If all data is to be added to ExperimentHub >> in the future, I think I should try to transition asap, before any >> publications come out that can't be changed later on. Although that will >> mean to the data to be available through devel only when the book >> chapter, for example, is published. > > Given the time constraints I would stick with AnnotationHub. There is no > problem hosting the MS/proteomics data there.
Ok, thank - will keep it as is for now then. Laurent >> Will there be some cross-talk between EH and AH to assure some backwards >> compatibility? > > We don't have plans to actively move data from AH to EH but could do it > if the author wanted to and if the data were appropriate. You bring up a > good point about backwards compatibility between the hubs. I don't think > it's a good idea to have both an 'AH' id and 'EH' id and maintain a > mapping between the two. While we are creating separate hubs for > management purposes the interfaces will be very similar. It shouldn't > matter much to the end user whether they get data from AH or EH. > > Valerie >> >> Laurent >> >>> Valerie >>> >>> >>> >>> On 03/13/2016 12:27 PM, Laurent Gatto wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> Now that ExperimentHub is out, what is the policy regarding data that is >>>> currently in AnnotationHub? In particular, I am wondering if there is >>>> any action to be taken with ProteomicsAnnotationHubData, whose role is >>>> to disseminate MS/proteomics data via AnnotationHub. >>>> >>>> Best wishes, >>>> >>>> Laurent >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential >>> information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or >>> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended >>> recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, >>> distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have >>> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by >>> e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you. >> > > > > This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential > information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or > agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended > recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, > distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited. If you have > received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by > e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you. -- Laurent Gatto | @lgatt0 http://cpu.sysbiol.cam.ac.uk/ http://lgatto.github.io/ _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
