For the record, here is the log message: Version bump to trigger package rebuilding now that purl()'ing issue has been correctly identified. knitr does not create purl()'ed (Stangle equivalent) .R files if _R_CHECK_TIMINGS_ is set, which the build system was setting. Now it's not set, so these .R files are now created. See https://github.com/yihui/knitr/issues/1212 for more.
Dan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kasper Daniel Hansen" <kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> > To: "Ulrich Bodenhofer" <bodenho...@bioinf.jku.at> > Cc: "bioc-devel" <bioc-devel@r-project.org>, "msa" <m...@bioinf.jku.at>, > keb...@bioinf.jku.at > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 7:15:35 AM > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Version numbers incremented? > Ulrich, "svn log" does not help you here? > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer <bodenho...@bioinf.jku.at >> wrote: > >> Thanks, Leonardo! Yes, all my four packages use knitr, while the other >> eight packages I mentioned use Sweave. So my question is answered and the >> issue is closed, thanks again! I just wanted to know what happened, since I >> could not find an explaination why the version numbers have been bumped. >> >> Best regards, >> Ulrich >> >> >> On 05/17/2016 02:17 PM, Leonardo Collado Torres wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Does your package use knitr for creating the vignettes? If so, it must >>> be because of >>> https://github.com/lcolladotor/derfinder/commit/c70ede92fb14e83a0fe0032353f7f897ff55b5d5 >>> (the equivalent commit for your package). >>> >>> Best, >>> Leonardo >>> >>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer >>> <bodenho...@bioinf.jku.at> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I just noticed that the version numbers of many (yet not all) packages >>>> have >>>> recently been incremented from x.y.0 to x.y.2 both in the devel and in >>>> the >>>> release branch. Actually, this affected all four packages I am >>>> maintaining, >>>> but strangely none of the other eight packages that are maintained by >>>> other >>>> members of my group. As it seems to me, the only change was the version >>>> number in the DESCRIPTION file itself. What is the reason for that? I'm >>>> sorry if this subject has been covered already and if I should know >>>> that. At >>>> least I could not find any information on the bioc-devel list. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance and best regards, >>>> Ulrich >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel