Hi Antonio, Yes the stats for November look low compared to the previous months. Looks like we'll hardly hit the 30000 distinct IPs for the whole Bioconductor software repository. Could be genuine though. I'll check what's going on.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention, H. On 11/29/2016 01:51 PM, Antonio Colaprico wrote:
Dear all, Dear Hervè, I noted something strange with the download stats in November if you consider even default Bioconductor packages (*BiocInstaller* (26209) <http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/BiocInstaller/>, *BiocGenerics* (18864) <http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/BiocGenerics/>, *IRanges* (18129) <http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/IRanges/> etc they are showing about 50% of the download stats compared to other months of the year. I know my post is similar to one posted by Kasper indeed I had the same sensation maybe because there is Christmas atmosphere around. Therefore if I'm not mistaken or I lost some news about the stats how Kasper did know already about this issue 3 weeks ago? ;-) @Hervè please when you have time can you check them? Thank you in advance. Best, Antonio 2016-11-08 19:04 GMT+01:00 Kasper Daniel Hansen <kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com <mailto:kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com>>: This is a bit embarrassing. Somehow I was convinced it was December. All looks fine.("... you have gained a level in Distracted Professorship"). Kasper On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Hervé Pagès <hpa...@fredhutch.org <mailto:hpa...@fredhutch.org>> wrote: > Hi Kasper, > > The download stats just got updated: > > http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/ <http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/> > > They are updated twice a week, on Tuesday and Friday between 8 > and 9 AM PST. Note that because of how the download log files are > generated and propagated to the machine where the stats are computed, > and because of the time it takes to generate the stats reports for > all the packages, the current stats don't take into account the > downloads that happened during the last 24 hours (more or less). > > Cheers, > H. > > > On 11/08/2016 07:50 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen wrote: > >> It was pointed out to me that the (sub) heading on the page tells me that >> the script for counting downloads was last run Nov 4th, explaining the >> discrepancy. >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen < >> kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com <mailto:kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Is there something wrong with the download stats in November. All the >>> packages I look at have lost about 85-90% compared to other months of the >>> year: >>> http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/GenomicRanges/ <http://bioconductor.org/packages/stats/bioc/GenomicRanges/> >>> >>> Best, >>> Kasper >>> >>> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org <mailto:Bioc-devel@r-project.org> mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel> >> >> > -- > Hervé Pagès > > Program in Computational Biology > Division of Public Health Sciences > Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center > 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 > P.O. Box 19024 > Seattle, WA 98109-1024 > > E-mail: hpa...@fredhutch.org <mailto:hpa...@fredhutch.org> > Phone: (206) 667-5791 <tel:%28206%29%20667-5791> > Fax: (206) 667-1319 <tel:%28206%29%20667-1319> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org <mailto:Bioc-devel@r-project.org> mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel>
-- Hervé Pagès Program in Computational Biology Division of Public Health Sciences Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Ave. N, M1-B514 P.O. Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109-1024 E-mail: hpa...@fredhutch.org Phone: (206) 667-5791 Fax: (206) 667-1319 _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
