This already looks much improved, thanks Andrzej and Aaron. I think workflows are where it's at, and this page is probably underappreciated by Bioconductor users and the outside community.
My wishlist for the workflows page, which may exceed what is available for the current effort: 1) It should say at the top which version of R/Bioconductor the workflows are being built on. 2) On the main page, for each workflow: * A thumbnail (could live in a pre-specified location in the package) * Author list (autopopulated from DESCRIPTION) * Version * Link to the (most current) F1000Research articles for those which are published (new field in DESCRIPTION?) * Some kind of CI "buttony" thing, to indicate to users that these are live documents * Key Bioc/R packages used in this worfklow (could this also be an additional DESCRIPTION field?) 3) I think it would be good to encourage the more stubby workflow descriptions to add more text, and maybe to decrease the very words ones, so that it's more consistent. Wow, that's pretty obsessive of me, but I think it would make the page look more professional. 4) Text somewhere with a link to the support site and how to ask for help on workflows (e.g. vignette(), ?functionName) 5) An advertisement somewhere for submitting a workflow, link to more detailed doc elsewhere _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel