Hi, thanks everyone for the input, I now have a few more leads to follow. It would be great to have a general single package builder even for existing packages to check if one has no direct access to the failing architecture.
https://win-builder.r-project.org/ is discouraging BioC package upload, and might have a different build environment. Let's see if we get a working Rdisop for easter. A nice weekend everyone, yours, Steffen On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 13:25 +0000, Martin Morgan wrote: > I second the idea of reproducing with the Windows build commands, > which have to do more than 'just' build for a particular > architecture. One might test the hypothesis that it is staged install > that is causing the problem with > > StagedInstalll: no > > in the DESCRIPTION file. -- IPB Halle AG Massenspektrometrie & Bioinformatik Dr. Steffen Neumann http://www.IPB-Halle.DE Weinberg 3 Tel. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1470 06120 Halle +49 (0) 345 5582 - 0 sneumann(at)IPB-Halle.DE Fax. +49 (0) 345 5582 - 1409 _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel