Hi, Recently I was looking how package reviews are done. Specifically those packages from developers on the Bioconductor team, or listing the Bioconductor Package Maintainer as the maintainer.
Some of those packages become the backbone of other packages and perhaps there are some experiences on the reviewing the 50 packages that Bioconductor is currently maintaining. However, I couldn't find if there are under the same review process than other packages? Or are there any other expectations on the review of those packages? Sorry if this has been described before, I couldn't come up with a good search term, and didn't find anything on the Package Submission website. And as a fairly new contributor I don't know how package reviews were done before github. Many thanks, Lluís [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel