Hi Benjamin and Chris, I’ll have the review out today.
Best regards, Nitesh > On May 30, 2020, at 8:32 PM, Haibe-Kains, Benjamin > <benjamin.haibe-ka...@uhnresearch.ca> wrote: > > Thanks Martin, your prompt reply is mostly appreciated. Any chance that > RadioGx and ToxicoGx will be reviewed before July? This would be really > beneficial for our Bioconductor workshop. > > Thanks to all maintainers and reviewers for their great job, these are > difficult times and it is great to see the community doubling down on the > work to get Bioconductor better every day. > > Regards > > --- > Benjamin Haibe-Kains, PhD > Senior Scientist > Princess Margaret Cancer Centre<http://www.theprincessmargaret.ca/ > <http://www.theprincessmargaret.ca/>> > University Health Network<http://www.uhn.ca/ <http://www.uhn.ca/>> > Associate Professor > University of Toronto<http://www.utoronto.ca/ <http://www.utoronto.ca/>> > Department of Medical Biophysics<http://medbio.utoronto.ca/ > <http://medbio.utoronto.ca/>> > > http://www.pmgenomics.ca/bhklab/ <http://www.pmgenomics.ca/bhklab/> > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the > sole use of the intended recipient. Any review or distribution by anyone > other than the person for whom it was originally intended is strictly > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the > sender and delete all copies. Opinions, conclusions or other information > contained in this e-mail may not be that of the organization. > > On May 30, 2020, 17:04 -0400, Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.b...@gmail.com > <mailto:mtmorgan.b...@gmail.com>>, wrote: > Sorry that your packages have not been reviewed more promptly. > > We try to have an initial review in two weeks, how long a full review takes > depends on many factors, including complexity of the review process. Your own > packages were I believe handled relatively efficiently initially. The release > at the end of April) is a major activity for us, and necessarily slows the > overall process down. > > We are exploring processes to reduce the reviewer burden so that packages > like yours are added to Bioconductor more promptly; a major concern is to do > so in a manner that does not compromise the overall quality of accepted > packages. > > Martin > > On 5/30/20, 4:52 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Chris Eeles" > <bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org on behalf of christopher.ee...@outlook.com> > wrote: > > Hello Bioconductor team and community, > > My name is Christopher Eeles and I am a software developer in the Benjamin > Haibe-Kains laboratory at Princess Margaret Cancer Research Centre in > Toronto, Ontario, Canada. > > I am concerned due to inaction on the part of my reviewer for two of my > package submissions, and am not sure how to move forward. > > Initially, I submitted three packages - CoreGx, ToxicoGx and RadioGx - on > April 4th, 2020 hoping to get included in the May Bioconductor release. It > became apparent that approval would not be possible in time, as such I > requested to expedite acceptance of CoreGx (on which the latter two packages > depend) so it could be included. My reviewer obliged and I am thankful for > that. > > I was told to resubmit ToxicoGx and RadioGx on separate issues and that the > review process would continue from where it was for the resubmissions. This > occurred on April 25th, 2020. Before resubmission I had replied to a round of > reviewer comments and was waiting for a reply before making more changes. > > However, since resubmission I have received no further reviewer comments and > no reply to my code updates since the last review. RadioGx will be a part of > a workshop our lab is putting together for Bioconductor conference in July, > but without acceptance of the package it will have to be installed from > GitHub. > > Additionally, ToxicoGx is the package that was used to curate data for our > web application, ToxicoDB, which has been accepted to the NAR web server > edition. We had assumed that the package would be accepted by now and have > had criticism from our NAR reviewers about it's lack of availability. Both of > these packages were available on CRAN before our submission to Bioconductor. > > My question is, how do I move forward? Without response from my reviewer I do > not know which conditions I need to meet for package acceptance? I am > available to respond to criticism. > > Initial submission of these packages occurred almost 2 months ago, and it has > been over a month since the resubmissions. Is this normal? Are there > extenuating circumstances of which I am unaware? > > Our lab put a lot of time and effort into these packages and wish to share > them with the Bioconductor community. Does anyone have advice on what I can > do to get the ball rolling again? > > Thanks for your assistance. > > Best, > --- > Christopher Eeles > Software Developer > BHK Laboratory<http://www.bhklab.ca/> > Princess Margaret Cancer Centre<https://www.pmgenomics.ca/pmgenomics/> > University Health Network<http://www.uhn.ca/> > > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the > sole use of the intended recipient. > Any review or distribution by anyone other than the person for whom it was > originally intended is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and > delete all copies. > Opinions, conclusions or other information contained in this e-mail may not > be that of the organization. > > If you feel you have received an email from UHN of a commercial nature and > would like to be removed from the sender's mailing list please do one of the > following: > (1) Follow any unsubscribe process the sender has included in their email > (2) Where no unsubscribe process has been included, reply to the sender and > type "unsubscribe" in the subject line. If you require additional information > please go to our UHN Newsletters and Mailing Lists page. > Please note that we are unable to automatically unsubscribe individuals from > all UHN mailing lists. > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org <mailto:Bioc-devel@r-project.org> mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
