On Dec 18, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Richard Holland wrote:
Whilst BioJava supports the < and > annotation, and will correctly
load
these from the file and store them as FuzzyLocations internally,
when it
is asked to write them to BioSQL they are lost. This is BioSQL has no
way of storing this information.
That's actually not true. BioSQL has the location_qualifier_value
table for storing this, and the foreign key to term to store the
location type.
Bioperl-db does indeed lose this information when persisting feature
locations to BioSQL, but that's Bioperl-db's fault, not BioSQL's.
Or am I missing something?
-hilmar
--
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at gmx dot net :
===========================================================
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list - Biojava-l@lists.open-bio.org
http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
