On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 01:15:28AM +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > > > Other packets are sent to the neighbor IP address, which is a slight > > > > > diversion from RFC 2328, but should not cause any problems. > > > > > > > > But a stricter router may reject OSPF msg over an ptp links if > > > > they aren't addressed to AllSPFRouters. > > > > > > I just noticed you impl. a PTMP I/F type, nice :) > > > > I updated to new nexhp calc. patch to match your latest > > changes. I hope you like it. > > Did some more spf improvements. Lets see if you like these too:
> + /* The first case - local network */
> + if (en->lsa.type == LSA_T_NET)
> + return new_nexthop(po, IPA_NONE, ifa->iface, ifa->ecmp_weight);
> +
> + /* The second case - ptp or ptmp neighbor */
> + if (en->lsa.type == LSA_T_RT)
> + {
> + if (ifa->type == OSPF_IT_PTP)
> + return new_nexthop(po, ifa->addr->opposite, ifa->iface,
> + ifa->ecmp_weight);
As i wrote 21 Dec 2010 11:42:56, this is not correct, opposite might
be undefined.
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org)
OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
