On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 01:45:22AM +0000, Nick wrote: > > When I downgrade to 1.2.5 the flood doesn't come back. > > I am not sure how interpret this sentence. In 1.2.5, there > was a flood or not?
In 1.2.3 and 1.2.5 there was no flood. In git there was a flood. > Which routes are exported to the BGP? Static routes or from another > BGP? from another BGP > It would be a good idea to enable debug messages 'debug all > { routes }' to know if there is the same flood inside BIRD or just > on the output of BGP. >>> pipe_dn42_routes < replaced 172.22.55.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes > added 172.22.55.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes < replaced 172.22.50.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes > added 172.22.50.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes < replaced 172.22.62.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes > added 172.22.62.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes < replaced 172.22.59.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes > added 172.22.59.0/24 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes < replaced 172.22.44.0/23 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes > added 172.22.44.0/23 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes < replaced 172.22.41.0/27 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 >>> pipe_dn42_routes > added [best] 172.22.41.0/27 via 172.22.104.40 on >>> dn42_as64704 >>> kernel1 < replaced 172.22.41.0/27 via 172.22.104.40 on dn42_as64704 The messages fly too fast for my terminal. Do you need a longer log? -- Wanna turn ICANN into ICANN't? Join a darknet today: http://www.anonet2.org/darknet_comparison