On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 11:05:16AM -0700, Marty Anstey wrote: > > > * BFD - very useful for fast failure detection when peering through non- > > direct connection (e.g. like an internet exchange) > > > > > > * Link-state dependent routes - I remember this was discussed on the > > list a while back. If a physical link goes down, all routes and > > adjacencies dependent on that link should be instantly removed - we > > don't want to wait for some timeout. > > +1 for both of these. BFD (RFC 5880) in particular is something I would > really like to see implemented.
Link-state dependent routes we support from 1.3.0 -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
