On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Martin Mares wrote: > Hello! > > Moreover, this approach can improve the situation with kernel scan > > Wouldn't it be better to get rid of kernel scans completely? :-) > > I think they should not be needed on current Linux systems, they are > there only to make sure that no Netlink packets with updates got dropped.
As i understand, now when i mistakenly delete a route from kernel table, bird restore it on the next table scan. How will this works without table scan?
