Hi all,
I was performing a home lab and decided to test a new scenario including
iBGP between a router and RS.
That's a brief scheme of the lab:
###
5.5.5.1 5.5.5.2 6.6.6.100/24
6.6.6.6/24
6.6.6.101/24
Router3 (as3)---eBGP---> Router2 (as2)---iBGP/not a rs_client---> RS
(as2)---eBGP / rs_client--- > Router1 (as1)
3.3.3.0/24 2.2.2.0/24
1.1.1.0/24
###
Since, as route 3.3.3.0/24 is seen in RS directly attached ( first asn
is as3) with next-hop 6.6.6.100 (I've set the next-hop manually into the
RS's config in bgp_in) I expect that Router1 should see it in the same
way - with hext-hop 6.6.6.100.
But the route is shown with next-hop 6.6.6.6 instead. The first asn is
as3 as expected.
Do you have any idea why the next-hop is not propagated from RS to R1 as
present in the master table but changed to the local IP address ?
I think its related with the "not a rs_client" relation between Router2
and RS. Any idea how this behavior may be changed ?
Thank you in advance!
--
---
*Dean Belev*
