On 03/07/2013 01:58 PM, Andre Nathan wrote:
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
If there a specific need for advertising the routes you want to send to
your eBGP peer also via iBGP?
There's no need to send them via iBGP, but since the iBGP session learns
from the central BGP table (t_bgp), it ends up learning them.
And how do they end up in your t_bgp table? Via p_bgp_to_wzyx pipe, or
learned from quagga via iBGP?
Is the best solution to create an import filter in the iBGP session,
ignoring those prefixes? I was wondering about the behavior difference
vs Quagga, where I don't have any iBGP filters but those routes are not
learned in the iBGP session.
I don't know exactly about quagga, I do know I got very frustrated with
it and switched to bird. :)
Could this be a consequence of using "gateway direct;" in the iBGP
session?
I don't think so.
--
Hans van Kranenburg - System / Network Engineer
+31 (0)10 2760434 | [email protected] | www.mendix.com
