❦ 18 juillet 2014 18:01 +0100, Alex Bligh <a...@alex.org.uk> :

>> On 18.7.2014 10:50, Stanislav Datskevich wrote:
>>> So, this feature will not be implemented? I think BIRD will turn into
>>> BGP swiss-knife if it will be.
>> 
>> I think, this sounds interesting to me. And it shouldn't be very
>> complicated to code it. I will look at it.
>
> Can I suggest you make the syntax such that a script is but one option?
> I can see a good case for (e.g.) triggering a little lua to run, which
> would not involve a fork() and be much faster. Clearly someone else would
> have to code that bit, but generalising this might be useful. This way
> you could get your lua to filter out 99% of things before running
> (e.g.) a script. We have some experience integrating lua things and
> whilst I can't guarantee it, we may be prepared to take a look.

Another way to avoid forking is to allow a long-running process to
receive data, either through a socket or by spawning it and
communicating with it on stdin/stdout.
-- 
panic("aha1740.c"); /* Goodbye */
        2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/aha1740.c

Reply via email to