Hi, Emerson, For example, this is an actual Bird 1.6.7: 82968 of 82968 routes for 41553 networks bird 22191 1.6 2.6 123740 107788 And this is the same In a different environment: 544703 of 544703 routes for 503219 networks bird 22191 1.7 5.5 236172 220244 It is not a memory you should be concerned about. The main issue of bird with huge BGP tables is CPU – bird uses only one core. -- Best regards, Valery Lutoshkin From: Bird-users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Emerson Barea Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 8:57 PM To: Maria Matejka Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: BGP table size Sorry, I think that I didn't explaim well in my first message.
I want to know if exist any information that tell me how much RAM memory 100k BGP prefix uses in Bird, for example. I know Cisco uses between 28MB and 71MB of memory by 100k prefix [1]. So, I want to know if Bird has some information like this. Thank you Emerson [1] hhttps://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/12512-41.html Em seg, 12 de ago de 2019 às 09:33, Maria Matejka <[email protected]> escreveu: Hello! BIRD has in concept no limit on number of routes and number of prefices. It should scale quite well. If not, please let us know. Maria On 8/12/19 2:15 PM, Emerson Barea wrote: > Hi. Anyone knows if Bird documentation has any information about BGP > table size vs. number of routes? > Thanks. > Emerson
