On Fri 01 May 2020 21:12:10 GMT, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 07:46:54PM +0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It’s the first time I try to do such a configuration, but I can’t find > > the right syntax. > > > > route 2a00:5884:105::/48 via fe80::ae1f:6bff:fead:2ed8%enp3s0f1.30 > > → syntax error, unexpected '.' > > route 2a00:5884:105::/48 via fe80::ae1f:6bff:fead:2ed8%"enp3s0f1.30" > > → syntax error, unexpected TEXT, expecting CF_SYM_KNOWN or > > CF_SYM_UNDEFINED > > Hi > > It is a bit tricky. Expression fe80::ae1f:6bff:fead:2ed8%eth0 would work, > but because you have a dot in name, you need to write it as > fe80::ae1f:6bff:fead:2ed8%'enp3s0f1.30' > > The syntax here abuses symbol syntax (like is used for e.g. protocol > names).
Indeed, with simple quotes instead of double quotes it works. Thanks a lot! It’s not very obvious though ;) -- Alarig