Good morning,
after switching over to the following filter, as mentioned in the last
mails:
filter static_and_bgp_and_ospf {
if(source = RTS_STATIC || source = RTS_BGP || source = RTS_OSPF) then accept;
reject;
}
I still see routes that are missing in the kernel, even though they are
coming in via OSPF and BGP:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bird> show route all for 2a0a:e5c0:2:a::b
Table master6:
2a0a:e5c0:2:a::b/128 unicast [ospf6 2024-02-26] * E2 (150/10/10000)
[147.78.194.129]
via fe80::3eec:efff:fecb:d81a on eth0
Type: OSPF-E2 univ
OSPF.metric1: 10
OSPF.metric2: 10000
OSPF.tag: 0x00000000
OSPF.router_id: 147.78.194.129
unicast [router1_place10_v6_v4 2024-02-26 from
2a0a:e5c0:1:8::50] (100/10) [i]
via fe80::21b:21ff:febc:bf36 on eth1
Type: BGP univ
BGP.origin: IGP
BGP.as_path:
BGP.next_hop: 2a0a:e5c0:1:8::50 fe80::21b:21ff:febc:bf36
BGP.local_pref: 500
bird>
bird> show protocols all kernel_v6
Name Proto Table State Since Info
kernel_v6 Kernel master6 up 2024-02-05
Channel ipv6
State: UP
Table: master6
Preference: 10
Input filter: ACCEPT
Output filter: static_and_bgp_and_ospf
Routes: 0 imported, 199204 exported, 0 preferred
Route change stats: received rejected filtered ignored accepted
Import updates: 0 0 0 0 0
Import withdraws: 0 0 --- 0 0
Export updates: 11127835 0 7001 --- 11120834
Export withdraws: 1131164 --- --- --- 1133092
bird> show route count filter static_and_bgp_and_ospf
2802064 of 2802068 routes for 937748 networks in table master4
583651 of 583679 routes for 199200 networks in table master6
Total: 3385715 of 3385747 routes for 1136948 networks in 2 tables
bird>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(BGP can be ignored, the OSPF route is relevant)
Checking on the OS side, I see the local IPv6 address 2a0a:e5c0:2:a::a
on lo, but not the remote IPv6 address 2a0a:e5c0:2:a::b that should be added:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[08:08] server122.place10:~# ip -6 r | grep 2a0a:e5c0:2:a
2a0a:e5c0:2:a::a dev lo proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
[08:08] server122.place10:~# ip route get 2a0a:e5c0:2:a::b
RTNETLINK answers: Host is unreachable
[08:17] server122.place10:~#
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What am I doing wrong here?
And is there actually a CLI syntax for
verifying that a route is accepted by a filter? In case of this
particular filter there are a lot of matches, so displaying them and
checking is not really feasible.
Greetings from Seoul,
Nico
--
Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch
