Hello Douglas, just a really fast response, we aren't going to implement BGP over QUIC at all, at least when TLS is a required part of QUIC.
There are some thoughts about BGP 5 being encoded as CBOR and sent over something like QUIC, anyway it doesn't make any sense to introduce QUIC to BGP now. Maria On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 09:45:56AM -0300, Douglas Fischer wrote: > I'm not a programmer, and I know almost nothing about it... > > But reading this thread, I remembered this draft about BGP-over-QUIC. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-retana-idr-bgp-quic/ > > I'm not sure what I'm going to say, but I have the impression that the > session closure control method that will be chosen may have something to do > with this BoQ idea. > > I don't even know if what I'm saying makes any sense or not. > But if you do, it may be something that you have to take into consideration > when choosing the method. > > And besides, there are many other "ifs"... > We don't even know if this Draft will actually become an RFC. And if it > becomes RFC, we don't even know if it will have traction. > We also don't know if the IBRD project will adhere to this protocol, etc... > > But, I thought it was opportune to mention. > > Em qui., 16 de mai. de 2024 às 07:59, Ondrej Zajicek <santi...@crfreenet.org> > escreveu: > > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:37:18PM +0200, Job Snijders via Bird-users > > wrote: > > > > > Dear BIRD people, > > > > > > On most systems RFC 896 TCP congestion control is used, also known as > > > "Nagle's algorithm". This algorithm is intended to help coalesce > > > consecutive small packets from userland applications (like BIRD) into a > > > single larger TCP packet. The idea being it reduces bandwidth because > > > there is less TCP overhead if data is bundled into fewer packets. > > > ... > > > I think using TCP_NODELAY is interesting to consider, because it seems > > > sensible to try to deliver BGP messages as fast as possible. OpenBGPD > > > and FRR set the TCP_NODELAY socket option. > > > > Hi > > > > Yeah, i think that using TCP_NODELAY for BGP makes sense, considering > > there is already non-trivial framing and we write individual BGP messages > > with one write(). > > > > -- > > Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo > > > > Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) > > "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so." > > > > > -- > Douglas Fernando Fischer > Engº de Controle e Automação -- Maria Matejka (she/her) | BIRD Team Leader | CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.
