On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:54:52 +0000 Thomas Gambier <thomas.gamb...@nexedi.com> wrote:
> max-rtt-penalty 5000 > rtt-max 500 > rtt-decay 125 Thank you for sharing your experience with me! On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 18:18:42 +0200 Juliusz Chroboczek <j...@irif.fr> wrote: > >> Some of the VM's are in the same data center (latency < 1ms) and some > >> are very far away (Germany <-> Hong Kong 300ms-400ms). Which rtt-min, > >> rtt-max and rtt-cost/max-rtt-penalty would be suitable for such > >> a network? > > rtt-min should be chosen so that all links below rtt-min are local -- the > idea is that below rtt-min, it's not worth optimising the path. The > default value (10ms) should be fine in most networks. > > rtt-max should be larger than all good links in your network -- the idea > is that above rtt-max, it's no longer worth optimising the path. In your > case, you might want to increase the value to 350ms or so. Thanks for the quick answers! What should I set rtt-cost/max-rtt-penalty to? > -- Juliusz -- Marek Küthe m...@mk16.de er/ihm he/him
pgpWfTbPcsdVf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature