On Wed, 7 Jun 2006, Akim Demaille wrote: > always used this "feature" (which at the time was rather an exploit > from a loophole in the parser) with a single id: the name I wanted to > give to the union.
Is there a difference between that and a subsequent typedef YYSTYPE id in a literal block? > As for the first point, I had received complaints from users who > disliked the fact that they faced errors with yacc: they wanted bison > to be more yackish. POSIX specifies this? I didn't find it, but it's like searching for a needle in a haystack. Or is this just a common convention in yacc implementations? I can't imagine the original point of it. Joel
