On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Akim Demaille wrote: > I suppose we should produce some yacc.1, but should it be: > > - a stub that says that this is bison -y, read bison(1) > > - be a copy of bison.1 with the precision that this is > bison -y. > > - be a copy of bison.1 (with s/bison/yacc/, which is, btw, > not done in yacc --help). > > I think 1 or 2 are ok.
I'd prefer 1, but I'm fine with 2 also. > Another question is whether we leave bison.1 in the repository. > I left it there, so that we don't require help2man from maintainers > (it is called via missing). It seems fine to me to require help2man for maintainers. Maintainers should expect that they might need to update the --help output on occasion anyway.
