Hi Joel, Akim. > > By the way, in the NEWS entry for 2.5, are we ready to announce the > > > ability to put dashes in grammar symbol names? > > > > Yes, I think we are. But I don't remember you gave your opinion about > the > > names: given that _ and . are valid symbol names per POSIX, do we agree > that - > > should be too? > > Yes, I think it's a nice feature. We just need to remember to handle it > in Alex's work.
I think dashes must be treated exactly as dots in the my work. They are: - valid in bison symbols - invalid in c identifiers - can appear after c identifiers: "id.field", and "id-3". I'll try to handle it. -- Best regards, Alex Rozenman ([email protected]).
