On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Akim Demaille wrote: > Le 31 août 09 à 17:42, Joel E. Denny a écrit : > > > Hi Akim. > > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2009, Akim Demaille wrote: > > > > > > Alternatively, we could poll at help-bison and might get an answer > > > > faster. > > > > > > Yes, but what's the size of the poll? > > > > I just checked the subscriber list and it's 260. > > Wow, much larger than I expected. I should pay more attention to what I'm > writing :)
Scary, isn't it? :-) I wonder how many watch bison-patches. > So there are several polls: > > - c90 for generated yacc parsers (btw, the open group specs for yacc say > "write C source code, conforming to the ISO C standard", which is unclear bw > c90 and c99, but excludes any requirement to support knr). Ah, I didn't think to check open group. It also has this line: The C source code and header file shall be produced in a form suitable as input for the C compiler (see c99). > - remove the availability to reach the parse-params from the %printer and > %destructor, at least in lalr1.cc. > > - ? Maybe also a request for feedback on Bison's many experimental features. > > By the way, I'm not able to look at the subscriber lists for bug-bison and > > bison-patches. Why is that? > > No idea. The manager of the list may decide who can see the subscribers > (anybody|subscribers|manager) but I don't know what rule the fsf follows. Oh well. I doubt I'll pursue that further.
