Am 18.09.2018 um 23:48 schrieb Paul Eggert: > On 9/18/18 2:00 PM, Simon Sobisch wrote: >> >> I also don't think it is worth the effort to check for every C99 item >> that is needed. But a minimal check like stdint.h, long long and >> declaration-after-code wouldn't hurt, would it? > > > 'configure' is already doing all that.
Was this done after 3.1 release (that's the one I've tested and configure passed with using a compiler that *definitely* doesn't allow this)? If it was part of 3.1 then the branch of the configure script is buggy. Simon
