> Le 2 janv. 2019 à 08:13, Akim Demaille <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> We've never finished cleaning up the muscle names. If D really makes it into
> Bison, it would be sad that they use such inconsistent names, so let's finish
> this soon.
>
> I'm not very happy with api.parser.class, if someone has a better idea,
> please step forward! I have avoided api.parser.type, because api.value.type
> and api.location.type are not about declaring a type, but using a type. I
> think that api.parser.class.name is too long. But we do have
> api.value.union.name already.
>
> So api.parser.class.name could be better, but I'd be happy to have opinions.
Installed.
